Products related to Legitimacy:
-
The Governance of Macroprudential Policy : How to Build Regulatory Legitimacy Through a Social Justice Approach
This book critically examines the theoretical foundations and legal framework for macroprudential policy, its tools and governance in the UK, the US, and the EU.It goes deeper into a normative discussion of the legitimacy of macroprudential policy in these jurisdictions, where the mandate for maintaining financial stability has been delegated to independent authorities. The Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 reopened debates regarding legitimacy of the independent regulatory state, given its democratic deficit.The response to a perceived legitimacy gap has been to increase political oversight in financial policymaking and regulation.The book posits that the real problem is not a lack of democracy, but rather a lack of social justice.Across the globe, there is growing dissatisfaction with a financial system and regulatory process that appear depersonalised and perpetuate inequalities.Citizens are calling for more socially just systems of governance and the future success of financial policymakers and regulators will hinge on this.Given the marked distributional effects that have been noted in some macroprudential policy tools, the book questions whether macroprudential policy should be solely based on highly rationalised and strongly quantitative reasons. By proposing that macroprudential policymakers should have a social justice mandate alongside their financial stability mandate, as well as legal mechanisms for operationalising the added authority, the book contributes to the growing discourse on the role of social justice in public policy.
Price: 42.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Global Legitimacy Crises : Decline and Revival in Multilateral Governance
This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence.It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. Global Legitimacy Crises addresses the consequences of legitimacy in global governance, in particular asking: when and how do legitimacy crises affect international organizations and their capacity to rule.The book starts with a new conceptualization of legitimacy crisis that looks at public challenges from a variety of actors.Based on this conceptualization, it applies a mixed-methods approach to identify and examine legitimacy crises, starting with a quantitative analysis of mass media data on challenges of a sample of 32 IOs.It shows that some, but not all organizations have experienced legitimacy crises, spread over several decades from 1985 to 2020.Following this, the book presents a qualitative study to further examine legitimacy crises of two selected case studies: the WTO and the UNFCCC.Whereas earlier research assumed that legitimacy crises have negative consequences, the book introduces a theoretical framework that privileges the activation inherent in a legitimacy crisis.It holds that this activation may not only harm an IO, but could also strengthen it, in terms of its material, institutional, and decision-making capacity.The following statistical analysis shows that whether a crisis has predominantly negative or positive effects depends on a variety of factors.These include the specific audience whose challenges define a certain crisis, and several institutional properties of the targeted organization.The ensuing in-depth analysis of the WTO and the UNFCCC further reveals how legitimacy crises and both positive and negative consequences are interlinked, and that effects of crises are sometimes even visible beyond the organizational borders.
Price: 83.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Legitimacy Politics : Elite Communication and Public Opinion in Global Governance
Once staunch advocates of international cooperation, political elites are increasingly divided over the merits of global governance.Populist leaders attack international organizations for undermining national democracy, while mainstream politicians defend their importance for solving transboundary problems.Bridging international relations, comparative politics, and cognitive psychology, Lisa Dellmuth and Jonas Tallberg explore whether, when, and why elite communication shapes the popular legitimacy of international organizations.Based on novel theory, experimental methods, and comparative evidence, they show that elites are influential in shaping how citizens perceive global governance and explain why some elites and messages are more effective than others.The book offers fresh insights into major issues of our day, such as the rise of populism, the power of communication, the backlash against global governance, and the relationship between citizens and elites.It will be of interest to scholars and students of international organisations, and experimental and survey research methods.
Price: 29.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union and Global Governance : Building a European Demos
This book addresses one of the most relevant challenges to the sustainability of the European Union (EU) as a political project: the deficit of citizens’ support.It identifies missing elements of popular legitimacy and makes proposals for their formal inclusion in a future Treaty reform, while assessing the contribution that the EU may make to global governance by expanding a credible democratic model to other international actors.The contributors offer perspectives from law, political science, and sociology, and the 15 case studies of different aspects of the incipient European demos provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of these pertinent questions.The edited volume provides a truly interdisciplinary study of the citizens’ role in the European political landscape that can serve as a basis for further analyses of the EU’s democratic legitimacy.It will be of use to legal scholars and political scientists interested in the EU’s democratic system, institutional setup and external relations.
Price: 109.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What is the legitimacy of the European Court of Justice?
The legitimacy of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is derived from its role as the highest court in the European Union, responsible for interpreting EU law and ensuring its consistent application across member states. The ECJ's legitimacy is also rooted in its independence and impartiality, as well as its adherence to the principles of the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights. Furthermore, the ECJ's decisions are binding on all EU member states, which enhances its legitimacy as a central institution in the EU's legal framework. Overall, the ECJ's legitimacy is based on its essential function in upholding the legal order of the EU and ensuring the uniform application of EU law.
-
What is a legitimacy crisis?
A legitimacy crisis occurs when an individual, organization, or government loses the trust and confidence of the public, leading to a loss of legitimacy and authority. This can be caused by a variety of factors, such as corruption, unethical behavior, or a failure to address the needs and concerns of the people. When a legitimacy crisis occurs, it can lead to widespread distrust, protests, and a breakdown of social and political order. Restoring legitimacy often requires significant efforts to address the underlying issues and rebuild trust with the affected stakeholders.
-
How can the legitimacy of jihad be compared to the legitimacy of Urban II's crusade?
The legitimacy of jihad and Urban II's crusade can be compared in terms of their religious justifications and historical contexts. Both were seen as legitimate by their respective religious communities, with jihad being justified within Islamic teachings and the crusade being sanctioned by the Catholic Church. Additionally, both were seen as defensive actions by their proponents, with jihad being seen as a struggle to defend Islam and the crusade being seen as a response to the perceived threat of Muslim expansion in the Holy Land. However, the legitimacy of both has been questioned by modern scholars and historians, who have critiqued the violence and religious intolerance associated with both concepts.
-
What is a formal legitimacy error?
A formal legitimacy error occurs when an action or decision is made by an individual or organization that does not have the proper authority or mandate to do so. This can include situations where the decision-making process was not followed correctly, or where the decision was made by someone who does not have the necessary qualifications or authorization. Formal legitimacy errors can undermine the credibility and effectiveness of the decision-making process, leading to potential challenges or disputes.
Similar search terms for Legitimacy:
-
Sovereign Excess, Legitimacy and Resistance
When talking about his film Salò, Pasolini claimed that nothing is more anarchic than power, because power does whatever it wants, and what power wants is totally arbitrary. And yet, upon examining the murderous capital of modern sovereignty, the fragility emerges of a power whose existence depends on its victims’ recognition.Like a prayer from God, the command implores to be loved, also by those whom it puts to death.Benefitting from this "political theurgy" as the book calls it (the idea that a power, like God, claiming to be full of glory, constantly needs to be glorified) is Barnardine, the Bohemian murderer in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure, as he, called upon by power to the gallows, answers with a curse: ‘a pox o’ your throats’.He does not want to die, nor, indeed, will he. And so, he becomes sovereign. On a level with and against the State.
Price: 39.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Diversity Judgments : Democratizing Judicial Legitimacy
The US Supreme Court's legitimacy-its diminishing integrity and contribution to the good of society-is being questioned today like no other time in recent memory.Criticisms reflect the perspectives of both 'insiders' (straight white males) and 'outsiders' (mainly people of color, women, and the LGBTQ community).Neither perspective digs deep enough to get at the root of the Court's legitimacy problem, which is one of process.The Court's process of decision-making is antiquated and out of sync with a society that looks and thinks nothing like the America of the eighteenth century, when the process was first implemented.The current process marginalizes many Americans who have a right to feel disenfranchised.Leading scholar of jurisprudence Roy L. Brooks demonstrates how the Court can modernize and democratize its deliberative process, to be more inclusive of the values and life experiences of Americans who are not straight white males.
Price: 38.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Good Policing : Trust, Legitimacy and Authority
Renowned criminologist Mike Hough illuminates the principles and practices of good policing in this important analysis of the police service’s legitimacy and the factors, such as public trust, that drive it. As concern grows at the growth in crimes of serious violence, he challenges conventional political and public thinking on crime and scrutinises strategies and tactics like deterrence and stop-and-search.Contrasting ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ approaches to policing and punishment, he offers a fresh perspective that stresses the importance of securing normative compliance. For officers, students, policy makers and anyone who has an interest in the police force, this is a valuable roadmap for ethical policing.
Price: 14.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Beyond Neighbourhood Planning : Knowledge, Care, Legitimacy
The past three decades have seen an international ‘turn to participation’ – letting those who will be affected by outcomes play an active role in decision-making – but there is widespread dissatisfaction with actual instances of citizen-state engagement.Neighbourhood planning in England exemplifies this contradiction. This innovative analysis brings theory, research and practice together to give insights into how and why citizen voices become effective or get excluded.Ethnographic data from detailed studies of neighbourhood planning are used to illustrate the constraints and possibilities of a wide range of participatory governance practices and social movements.The book concludes with recommendations to re-invigorate community involvement in planning and beyond.
Price: 26.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What are the grounds for legitimacy?
The grounds for legitimacy can vary depending on the context, but generally, legitimacy is based on the acceptance and recognition of authority by the people or relevant stakeholders. Legitimacy can be derived from legal frameworks, such as constitutions or laws, which establish the authority of a government or institution. It can also be based on historical or traditional norms, where authority is accepted due to longstanding customs or cultural practices. Additionally, legitimacy can be derived from the consent of the governed, where the people willingly accept the authority of a government or institution through democratic processes or social contracts.
-
What is the legitimacy of a contract?
The legitimacy of a contract refers to whether the contract is legally binding and enforceable. For a contract to be considered legitimate, it must meet certain criteria such as mutual agreement, offer and acceptance, consideration, capacity of the parties to enter into the contract, and legality of the subject matter. If any of these elements are missing or if the contract was entered into under duress, fraud, or coercion, it may be deemed illegitimate and unenforceable in a court of law. Ultimately, the legitimacy of a contract is essential for ensuring that parties are held accountable for their obligations and that their rights are protected.
-
What legitimacy does the majority vote have?
The majority vote is considered legitimate because it reflects the will of the majority of the people participating in the decision-making process. It is a fundamental principle of democracy that ensures that decisions are made based on the preferences of the majority, thereby promoting fairness and equality. The legitimacy of the majority vote lies in the idea that it represents the collective voice of the people and provides a mechanism for peaceful resolution of conflicts and differences in opinions.
-
What is the legitimacy of Input-Output?
Input-Output is a legitimate method used in economics and business to analyze the interdependencies between different sectors of an economy. It provides a systematic way to understand how changes in one sector can impact other sectors, making it a valuable tool for policymakers, businesses, and researchers. Input-Output analysis is widely accepted and used in various fields due to its ability to provide insights into the complex relationships within an economy.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.